Login

Provider Recruitment

Edit

Eligible Clinicians:

Licensed Clinical Social Workers; PhD Psychologists; Psychiatrists; Psychiatric Nurse Practitioners; non-Psychiatrist MDs with significant experience conducting forensic asylum evaluations. As a note, these requirements are based entirely on MSHRP’s experience with IJ’s acceptance of affidavits. If someone who is not eligible reaches out to the program, just politely inform them that we are grateful for their interest, but the judges in the immigration courts where we work have not accepted certain degree types in the past.

Process for onboarding new evaluators:

Evaluators with prior forensic experience (e.g. experience both attending a training and conducting forensic evaluations of asylum seekers) need to complete the following next steps. This email outlines these steps and can serve as a template.

Note:

that forensic evaluators with prior experience do not need to shadow, but may want to shadow a telephonic evaluation before they began conducting remote evaluations independently. In that case, please arrange per the clinician’s preference.

Note:

Any experienced NYC-based MSHRP evaluator is welcome to join the remote evaluation network. They should follow all steps above except for sending a sample redacted affidavit for review.

Evaluators without forensic experience:

  1. Need to attend a general forensic asylum training. This can be the annual MSHRP training, or any other PHR affiliated training. This website is continuously updated with new trainings, and should be sent to clinicians waiting for training (particularly as new training arise in their region, or webinar/online trainings are made available).
  2. Need to (per instructions above to experienced clinicians): watch the telephonic module; upload their CV and professional licenses to Box; review roles and responsibilities.

  3. Need to shadow an experienced mentor clinician.

    It is important that, for evaluations they are shadowing, new clinicians are involved in preparing the first draft of the affidavit for the mentor clinician’s review. All expectations (deadlines, timelines, division of responsibility) should be made clear to mentor and shadowing clinicians in advance. Some clinicians will want to shadow multiple evaluations before they are ready on their own -- this is fine, and we defer to clinicians’ comfort. After a new clinician has shadowed and prepared an affidavit under supervision, it is a good idea to check in with the mentor and make sure they feel the new clinician’s draft was high quality.

  4. As soon as all onboarding requirements are complete [signaled in the Telephonic Directory as ‘green’ highlighted], the evaluator is ready to accept cases!